The MX and EVO series from Crucial and Samsung, respectively, have always been in direct competition with each other. Now the more than 3 years older Crucial MX500 has to face the current Samsung SSD 870 EVO. As we all know that these both SSDs use the SATA protocol, and the speed would never go beyond 600MB/s.
So whether you are using any of these SSDs, don’t expect anything more than that. However, because the Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 870 Evo are competing hard in this domain, various people want to know which one is the best between these both. In this article, we are going to reveal the same by doing some straight comparisons.
Overview of Crucial MX500 and Samsung 870 EVO
Crucial MX500
The MX500 is available in both M.2 and 2.5-inch varieties, so one type or the other is installable in pretty much any modern PC. Our 500GB review unit is in the 2.5-inch drive form factor, which means it fits in a standard laptop drive bay (for notebooks that still use full-size drives), or in most any desktop chassis. You can also opt for the much smaller M.2 version, which resembles a stick of gum and attaches directly to the motherboard (assuming the motherboard is recent enough to have an M.2 connector).
No matter which version you choose, performance should mostly be the same, assuming that you’re comparing MX500 models of equal capacity. This drive uses the SATA bus, the same as any modern consumer hard drive, instead of PCI Express in concert with the NVMe protocol. Maximum NVMe speeds are roughly six times greater than those that SATA will allow, but the difference isn’t readily apparent in everyday computing tasks.
Samsung 870 EVO
Given all else it’s known for across the galaxy, Samsung is certainly no stranger to the world of internal solid-state drives (SSDs). The company continues to be a leading force in the industry, producing some of the best SSDs we’ve reviewed year in and year out.
Pairing a few industry-standard features with a few more industry-leading speeds, the Samsung SSD 870 EVO comes within inches of successfully bridging the gap between SATA and NVME drives with stellar results in program and game launching, as well as booting into Windows 10.
Whether you need a new boot drive, a massive digital tome to store all your games (looking at you, Call of Duty: Warzone), or just a solid storage option all around, the zip-quick Samsung SSD 870 EVO is a premier option in the world of SATA SSDs, and easily wins our Editor’s Choice award as our favorite performance-minded SATA drive.
Samsung SSD 870 EVO vs Crucial MX500 – Technical Data Comparison Differences
| Crucial MX500 | Samsung 870 EVO | |
| Form factor | 2,5-Inch SATA, M.2 2280 | 2,5-Inch SATA SSD |
| Interface | SATA 6Gb/s (SATA III) | SATA 6Gb/s (SATA III) |
| Capacity | 250GB (SATA, M.2)
500GB (SATA, M.2) 1TB (SATA, M.2) 2TB (SATA) |
250 GB
500 GB 1 TB 2 TB 4 TB |
| NAND type | 3 Bit TLC | 3 Bit TLC |
| Sequential read | 560MB/s | 560MB/s |
| Sequential write | 510MB/s | 530 MB/s |
| Random read | 95.000 IOPS | 98.000 IOPS |
| Random write | 90.000 IOPS | 88.000 IOPS |
| Reliability (MTTF) | 1,8 million hours | 1,5 million hours |
| TBW | 100 TB (250 GB)
180 TB (500GB) 360 TB (1TB) 700 TB (2TB) |
150 TB (250GB)
300 TB (500GB) 600 TB (1TB) 1.200 TB (2TB) 2.400 TB (4TB) |
| Warranty | 5 years limited | 5 years limited |
Crucial MX500 vs 870 EVO: What’s the difference?
Form Factor and Interface
The MX500 and the Samsung SSD 870 EVO both rely on the backward compatible SATA 6 Gb/s (SATA III) interface for the connection to the rest of the system. In addition, both manufacturers use the 3-bit TLC flash memory, which has long been established on the market thanks to the balance between reliability, performance, and cost. However, compared to Samsung with the 870 EVO, Crucial offers the MX500 not only in the 2.5-inch format but also as an M.2 2280 SSD plug-in card.
Capacity
The Samsung SSD 870 EVO and the Crucial MX500 start with a storage size of 250 GB. The Samsung SSD is available with a maximum of 4 TB, the
MX500 has a 2.5-inch drive with 2 TB, and the M.2 2280 form factor with 1 TB. The warranty period is the same for both manufacturers at 5 years, although the TBW values of the 870 EVO are better compared to the MX500. One advantage of Crucial’s SSD could be the equipment in the form of a spacer from 7.0 to 9.5 millimeters in the 2.5-inch variant as well as the mounting screws in the plug-in card version.
Performance
In terms of performance, both SATA SSD drives are on the same very good level for the corresponding storage. If the speed of both the Samsung 870 EVO and Crucial MX500 SSD is up to 560 MB/s in sequential read, the former manages around 20 MB/s more in sequential write with a maximum of 530 MB/s. The performance of the MX500 is also very good. However, this should hardly be noticed in everyday use, just like the insignificant differences in random operations.
Price
Price is another one of the major factors affecting your decision. So, it becomes important to compare the prices of both these SSDs here because the differences are huge. The Samsung 870 Evo is way pricier than the MX500 even after having slightly similar features.
Generally, you will find all the variants of MX500 way cheaper than the Samsung 870 EVO. So, if you are looking just for an affordable yet effective SSD between both, Crucial MX500 is surely the best pick.
Which one should you buy?
The Crucial MX500 and the Samsung SSD 870 Evo are quite equal in view of the very similar performance, which is also due to the limiting SATA III interface. Crucial SSDs tend to be cheaper compared to Samsung’s drives, which leads to a better price-performance ratio.
If you are looking for a particularly large SSD with 4 TB, you can only go for the 870 EVO. However, if you need an inexpensive M.2 SSD that is connected via SATA interface, there is no way around the MX500.
FAQs
Is Crucial better than Samsung?
In my opinion, Samsung SSDs are suited for smaller amounts of memory which are written less frequently. Crucial MX500 suited for steady, long-term, non-spiking performance. You can go for ADATA SSDs. They are reliable but the cheaper ones will be a little slower because of the QLC type.
Is Samsung SSD reliable?
In storage drives, Samsung SSDs show extremely low failure rates in both the shop and in the field, a trend that Puget says has been ongoing for years. Over 1,000 870 EVO and QVO drives were sold during the covered period, with no reported failures.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this post has demonstrated the distinctions between the Crucial MX500 and Samsung 870 EVO in 5 cases. We think that you can easily know which SSD hard drive is better for you. If you are looking for a conformity SSD out of EVO 870 and MX500, read more information at Memoright.com…
